Fall 2025 Senate Results
All Election Results
Summary Rounds Constituencies of Elected Constituencies of Voters Shared Voter Support
Fall 2025
The results published on this site do not fully reflect the elected candidates of this election due to two disqualifications.
This site displays the votes as-is, before disqualifications took place, and the final results can be found on the SiteFarm site.
Spring 2025
The results published on this site do not fully reflect the elected candidates of this election due to this election cycle's unprecedented number of disqualifications.
These really are interesting times.
This site displays the votes as-is, before disqualifications took place, and the final results can be found on the SiteFarm site.
Summary
Candidates
13 candidates ran for six seats, and the voter turnout was 2,132.
Elected
| # | Candidate | Slate |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | Ryan Kan | Aggie Alliance |
| #2 | Aaron David Heth | Aggie Alliance |
| #3 | Nate Little | N/A |
| #4 | Jenna Younes | Warda Slate |
| #5 | Rosa Linda Martinez Ruano | UNIDAD |
| #6 | Mia Oscanoa | Aggie Alliance |
Not Elected
| Candidate | Slate |
|---|---|
| Ezra Rubin | N/A |
| Kelly Zamudio | UNIDAD |
| Ivan Garcia-Cervantes | N/A |
| Tanishka Kandakatla | N/A |
| Laurene Karajah | Warda Slate |
| Aayush Raina | N/A |
| Jake Owen Beeman | N/A |
Slate Representation
Four slates ran in this election. Slates are like political parties that run together as a group and pool resources.
#1 Choices Received By Each Slate
| Slate | Percent | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aggie Alliance | 39.35% | 839.00 | |
| N/A | 35.18% | 750.00 | |
| Warda Slate | 13.04% | 278.00 | |
| UNIDAD | 12.43% | 265.00 | |
Seats Received By Each Slate
| Slate | Percent | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aggie Alliance | 50.00% | 3.00 | |
| Warda Slate | 16.67% | 1.00 | |
| N/A | 16.67% | 1.00 | |
| UNIDAD | 16.67% | 1.00 | |
Number of Choices That Voters Ranked
Voters can rank as many or as few candidates on their ballot as they want.
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| Average # Ranked | 3.63 |
| Median # Ranked | 3 |
Voter Satisfaction
Shows which choice on the ballot was elected for voters. This is different from ballot representation because a voter can have their second choice elected, even though their ballot went to elect their third or fourth choice during the count.
| Choice | Percent | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 choice | 68.86% | 1468.00 | |
| No choices | 14.31% | 305.00 | |
| #2 choice | 13.74% | 293.00 | |
| #3 choice | 2.16% | 46.00 | |
| #4 choice | 0.56% | 12.00 | |
| #5 choice | 0.23% | 5.00 | |
| #6 choice | 0.14% | 3.00 | |
Ballot Representation
Shows where each ballot ultimately ended up, which is subtly different from voter satisfaction.
| Choice | Percent | Count | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #1 choice | 59.15% | 1261.06 | |
| No choices | 17.88% | 381.25 | |
| #2 choice | 9.99% | 212.96 | |
| #3 choice | 9.29% | 198.03 | |
| #4 choice | 1.73% | 36.78 | |
| #5 choice | 0.84% | 17.94 | |
| #6 choice | 0.42% | 9.05 | |
| #7 choice | 0.39% | 8.22 | |
| #8 choice | 0.25% | 5.34 | |
| #9 choice | 0.05% | 1.03 | |
| #10 choice | 0.01% | 0.32 | |
| #11 choice | 0.00% | 0.01 | |
| #12 choice | 0.00% | 0.00 | |